Ceia Group Themes

Ceia Group are building the room where executives from major streaming services, emerging OTT providers and content aggregators synthesise industry perspective into coherent governance norms. Where the key players across digital media and OTT streaming can talk openly and engage in direct and confidential dialogues that shape the regulatory streaming landscape while the markets are still forming.

Our Focus Areas

The Governance Questions That Actually Matter

Streaming services route user data, viewing analytics and content delivery signals across continents in milliseconds. Every jurisdiction wants sovereignty. Every platform needs coherence. The result: compliance teams larger than engineering teams, and innovation throttled by legal uncertainty.

Streaming services route user data, viewing analytics and content delivery signals across continents in milliseconds. Every jurisdiction wants sovereignty. Every platform needs coherence. The result: compliance teams larger than engineering teams, and innovation throttled by legal uncertainty.

What we're discussing:

Harmonised standards for data flows in distributed streaming architectures

Industry consensus on localisation requirements that respect both privacy and operational reality

Frameworks that satisfy regulatory intent without requiring impossible infrastructure

Transparent protocols that demonstrate accountability across jurisdictions

Recommendation algorithms generate 80% of viewing decisions. Regulators want transparency. Competitors want opacity. Users want better recommendations. Nobody’s clear on what “explainable AI” truly means in practice.

Legislative proposals demand algorithmic disclosure without understanding that recommendation systems are both trade secrets and constantly evolving. Static transparency frameworks can’t capture dynamic machine learning. Meanwhile, platforms need clarity on what accountability requires them to share.

What we're addressing:

Practical transparency standards that demonstrate responsibility without exposing proprietary systems

Industry-defined benchmarks for algorithmic fairness in content promotion

Frameworks distinguishing between commercial curation and editorial control

Standards for AI-generated content labelling and synthetic media protocols

Ad-supported tiers, hybrid subscriptions, micropayments, bundled packages, revenue shares with creators – streaming business models evolve faster than tax codes and payment regulations can accommodate.

When your pricing strategy changes quarterly, but financial services regulations assume annual stability, compliance becomes creative friction. Add cross-border transactions, currency conversion and creator revenue splits, and you’ve built a regulatory Jenga tower.

What needs solving:

Governance frameworks flexible enough to accommodate business model innovation

Payment protocol standards for multi-party revenue distribution

Tax and financial reporting structures that reflect streaming economics

Consumer protection guidelines that don't assume out-dated subscription models

Content rights are often negotiated for geographic territories, but streaming is borderless. VPNs make location metrics obsolete, yet rights holders want enforcement.

Traditional IP frameworks assume physical distribution and clear jurisdictional boundaries. Streaming distribution defies both. Meanwhile, AI-generated content, user remixes and algorithmic curation create IP grey zones that existing law doesn’t address.

Our roundtable focus:

Rights management protocols for global streaming in a territory-based licensing world

Industry standards for AI-generated and AI-curated content ownership

Anti-piracy frameworks that actually work without breaking user experience

Creator compensation models that reflect distributed, on-demand consumption

Governments want platforms held accountable. Platforms want clear rules. Users want protection. Traditional regulation delivers none of this effectively. Self-regulation gets dismissed as corporate evasion. The middle ground, where industry-developed standards dominate with transparent enforcement, exists nowhere at scale. Ceia Group wishes to architect this reality.

What we're creating:

Self-governance frameworks that demonstrate responsibility without regulatory micromanagement

Transparent compliance mechanisms that build public trust

Sector-wide codes of conduct for content moderation, user safety, and data practices

Third-party verification protocols that prove accountability without government oversight

Agile product development requires creative experimentation. Regulatory compliance requires predictability and documentation. These philosophies are fundamentally incompatible. Streaming platforms thrive on rapid iteration, yet traditional compliance frameworks assume products are stable and changes are infrequent.

What we're solving for:

Compliance frameworks designed for continuous deployment and product evolution

Risk-based regulation that focuses on outcomes, not process documentation

"Regulatory sandboxes" that let platforms test innovations with clear guardrails

Documentation standards that satisfy oversight without paralysing development cycles

Shape the Narrative

Ceia Group's thematic priorities respond to participant needs. If your organisation faces governance challenges beyond these six areas – or sees different dimensions within them – that shapes our convening focus.

Participate in the discussion